Timeline for Bayes theorem: normalisation denominator and likelihood
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 15, 2015 at 18:44 | comment | added | user42140 | @Hurkyl: Which bits are you referring to? | |
| Jun 15, 2015 at 14:21 | history | edited | Christoph Hanck | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 58 characters in body
|
| Jun 15, 2015 at 8:41 | comment | added | user41979 | It's always confusing when $\theta$ isn't $\theta$; consider renaming one of the dummy variables. | |
| Jun 15, 2015 at 8:08 | comment | added | Tomas | Also it is important to stress that likelihood is not a probability in case of continuous variables. | |
| Jun 15, 2015 at 5:58 | vote | accept | user42140 | ||
| Jun 15, 2015 at 5:58 | comment | added | user42140 | Thanks. Now, I see how the denominator acts as a normaliser. | |
| Jun 15, 2015 at 5:52 | history | answered | Christoph Hanck | CC BY-SA 3.0 |