Stack Exchange network consists of 183 Q&A communities including Stack Overflow, the largest, most trusted online community for developers to learn, share their knowledge, and build their careers.
(Attempting to) solve for the shape parameter. This fails; it seems that it is impossible to have a 15% censoring rate at a censoring time of .88 with a Weibull distribution where the scale parameter is held at 1, no matter what the shape parameter is: This fails; it seems that it is impossible to have a 15% censoring rate at a censoring time of .88 with a Weibull distribution where the scale parameter is held at 1, no matter what the shape parameter is.
(Attempting to) solve for the shape parameter. This fails; it seems that it is impossible to have a 15% censoring rate at a censoring time of .88 with a Weibull distribution where the scale parameter is held at 1, no matter what the shape parameter is:
(Attempting to) solve for the shape parameter: This fails; it seems that it is impossible to have a 15% censoring rate at a censoring time of .88 with a Weibull distribution where the scale parameter is held at 1, no matter what the shape parameter is.
(Attempting to) solve for the shape parameter. This crashes;fails; it seems that it may beis impossible to have a 15% censoring rate at a censoring time of .88 with a Weibull distribution where the scale parameter is held at 1, no matter what the shape parameter is:
(Attempting to) solve for the shape parameter. This crashes; it seems that it may be impossible to have a 15% censoring rate at a censoring time of .88 with a Weibull distribution where the scale parameter is held at 1, no matter what the shape parameter is:
(Attempting to) solve for the shape parameter. This fails; it seems that it is impossible to have a 15% censoring rate at a censoring time of .88 with a Weibull distribution where the scale parameter is held at 1, no matter what the shape parameter is: