Timeline for Allowed comparisons of mixed effects models (random effects primarily)
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 26, 2011 at 18:57 | history | edited | Aaron - mostly inactive | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
better detail
|
| Sep 26, 2011 at 18:43 | comment | added | Aaron - mostly inactive | Hi @Aniko, thanks for your careful reading. You are correct, and I will edit. | |
| Sep 26, 2011 at 18:41 | comment | added | Aniko | I downvoted the answer, because you are wrong (or at least misleading) about the applicability of the likelihood ratio test. | |
| Sep 26, 2011 at 18:07 | vote | accept | John | ||
| Sep 25, 2011 at 19:26 | comment | added | Aaron - mostly inactive | @John, I read those answers but missed where it discusses AIC and non-nested. I'm pretty sure it's fine, but can you give me a more precise pointer to that point in the answers? | |
| Sep 25, 2011 at 15:52 | comment | added | John | The question was just about comparing the models to model m, not to each other. But nevertheless, are you saying that the AIC comparisons can be made even when not nested? Answers to this question appear to contradict that. | |
| Sep 25, 2011 at 4:32 | history | edited | Aaron - mostly inactive | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added comment on nesting
|
| Sep 25, 2011 at 4:31 | comment | added | Aaron - mostly inactive | Oops, thanks for catching that, @Macro ! See edit. | |
| Sep 25, 2011 at 4:15 | comment | added | Macro | models m2 and m4 or m1 and m3 couldn't be compared with the likelihood ratio test. They are not nested models. | |
| Sep 25, 2011 at 1:49 | history | answered | Aaron - mostly inactive | CC BY-SA 3.0 |