Timeline for Meta Analysis for Binary Outcome, Two Groups, Pre and Post
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 20, 2015 at 15:43 | comment | added | Emilie | I was wrong, and I updated my answer. I hope it can help you ! | |
| Jul 20, 2015 at 15:43 | history | edited | Emilie | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 389 characters in body
|
| Jul 20, 2015 at 15:37 | comment | added | Emilie | I've re-checked the links, and I think you are wrong. The odd ratio effect size compare the odds between an experiment and a control. I'll try to improve my answer by doing an example with the data you gave. | |
| Jul 20, 2015 at 14:32 | comment | added | slammaster | The problem is that the study doesn't have a single odds ratio, it has two, there's an odds ratio for improvement for both the intervention and the control groups. Both of your links explain ORs as the single outcome, not a comparison of ORs | |
| Jul 17, 2015 at 14:35 | history | answered | Emilie | CC BY-SA 3.0 |