Skip to main content
I've made the title more explicit.
Link

Why is the L2 regularization is equivalent to Gaussian Priorprior?

edited tags
Link
Ferdi
  • 5.3k
  • 10
  • 47
  • 64
Tweeted twitter.com/#!/StackStats/status/626038542066712576
edited body
Source Link
Anonymous
  • 1.2k
  • 2
  • 11
  • 10

I keep reading this and intuitively I can see this but how does one go from L2 regularization to saying that this is a Gaussian Prior analytically.? Same goes for saying L1 is equivalent to a Laplacean prior.

Any further references would be great.

I keep reading this and intuitively I can see this but how does one go from L2 regularization to saying that this is a Gaussian Prior analytically. Same goes for saying L1 is equivalent to a Laplacean prior.

Any further references would be great.

I keep reading this and intuitively I can see this but how does one go from L2 regularization to saying that this is a Gaussian Prior analytically? Same goes for saying L1 is equivalent to a Laplacean prior.

Any further references would be great.

Source Link
Anonymous
  • 1.2k
  • 2
  • 11
  • 10
Loading