Skip to main content
Bumped by Community user
Tweeted twitter.com/StackStats/status/758501317799272448
added 12 characters in body; edited tags; edited title
Source Link
amoeba
  • 107.3k
  • 36
  • 321
  • 347

PCA on count-based datafractions, taking uncertainties into account

I'm looking to do a PCA analysis on count based data itself rather than averages. I'm hoping this will help for variable observation depths; for example, 3/4 reads is not really equivalent to 15/20. There is more confidence in the 15/20 being near 75% than for the 3/4.

Any ideas how how I could do this?

Here is some example data, each site is the number of positive reads and the number of total reads.

  • Individual, Site1, Site 2, ...
  • Indiv1, 7/9, 4/5, ..
  • Indiv2, 5/11, 7/22, ..
  • Indiv3, 14/29, 3/5...
Individual, Site1, Site 2, ...
Indiv1, 7/9, 4/5, ...
Indiv2, 5/11, 7/22, ...
Indiv3, 14/29, 3/5, ...

PCA on count-based data

I'm looking to do a PCA analysis on count based data itself rather than averages. I'm hoping this will help for variable observation depths; for example, 3/4 reads is not really equivalent to 15/20. There is more confidence in the 15/20 being near 75% than for the 3/4.

Any ideas how how I could do this?

Here is some example data, each site is the number of positive reads and the number of total reads.

  • Individual, Site1, Site 2, ...
  • Indiv1, 7/9, 4/5, ..
  • Indiv2, 5/11, 7/22, ..
  • Indiv3, 14/29, 3/5...

PCA on count-based fractions, taking uncertainties into account

I'm looking to do a PCA analysis on count based data itself rather than averages. I'm hoping this will help for variable observation depths; for example, 3/4 reads is not really equivalent to 15/20. There is more confidence in the 15/20 being near 75% than for the 3/4.

Any ideas how how I could do this?

Here is some example data, each site is the number of positive reads and the number of total reads.

Individual, Site1, Site 2, ...
Indiv1, 7/9, 4/5, ...
Indiv2, 5/11, 7/22, ...
Indiv3, 14/29, 3/5, ...
Source Link
Jautis
  • 628
  • 1
  • 7
  • 13

PCA on count-based data

I'm looking to do a PCA analysis on count based data itself rather than averages. I'm hoping this will help for variable observation depths; for example, 3/4 reads is not really equivalent to 15/20. There is more confidence in the 15/20 being near 75% than for the 3/4.

Any ideas how how I could do this?

Here is some example data, each site is the number of positive reads and the number of total reads.

  • Individual, Site1, Site 2, ...
  • Indiv1, 7/9, 4/5, ..
  • Indiv2, 5/11, 7/22, ..
  • Indiv3, 14/29, 3/5...