Timeline for When the results do not support the research
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 18, 2015 at 23:04 | vote | accept | Richard Rivers | ||
| Nov 18, 2015 at 23:04 | vote | accept | Richard Rivers | ||
| Nov 18, 2015 at 23:04 | |||||
| Sep 4, 2015 at 23:49 | answer | added | Robert Brown | timeline score: 0 | |
| Sep 4, 2015 at 19:56 | answer | added | Jeremy Miles | timeline score: 1 | |
| Sep 4, 2015 at 19:55 | comment | added | Tim | There is no evidence that the environmental factors affect disease or there is evidence that they do not affect the disease (those are two different things)? Sample of size 50 is considered to be pretty small in many areas, so is it sufficient in this case? | |
| Sep 4, 2015 at 19:53 | history | edited | Jeremy Miles | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 6 characters in body; edited title
|
| Sep 4, 2015 at 19:52 | history | edited | Tim | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 2 characters in body
|
| S Sep 4, 2015 at 19:39 | history | suggested | Richard Rivers | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
I have to explain more about the reasons the study does not convince to other people.
|
| Sep 4, 2015 at 19:16 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Sep 4, 2015 at 19:39 | |||||
| Sep 4, 2015 at 17:25 | comment | added | whuber♦ | I am confused by how you phrase this question. It begins "suppose that you have ... research" but ends "what did I do wrong." Evidently something changed in the telling. What are you trying to ask? | |
| Sep 4, 2015 at 17:22 | review | First posts | |||
| Sep 4, 2015 at 17:26 | |||||
| Sep 4, 2015 at 17:20 | history | asked | Richard Rivers | CC BY-SA 3.0 |