Timeline for General linear hypothesis test statistic: equivalence of two expressions
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 25, 2020 at 19:07 | comment | added | StubbornAtom | Related: stats.stackexchange.com/q/188626/119261. | |
| Oct 20, 2011 at 12:57 | comment | added | caracal | I'll accept this answer, but I'd still be very happy about an answer to my first question as well - literature tips are of course welcome! | |
| Oct 20, 2011 at 12:55 | vote | accept | caracal | ||
| Oct 18, 2011 at 17:41 | comment | added | user5594 | @caracal Sure. I edited my response to add in some details. | |
| Oct 18, 2011 at 17:41 | history | edited | user5594 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
updated to answer OP's response
|
| Oct 18, 2011 at 17:26 | comment | added | caracal | Thanks for your fast reply! Could you please explain the "which leads to noting that" step to $F_{1}$ a little bit further? That's the one I'm not getting... | |
| Oct 18, 2011 at 17:18 | history | edited | user5594 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Added in transposes
|
| Oct 18, 2011 at 17:11 | history | answered | user5594 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |