Skip to main content
16 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Feb 14, 2016 at 21:27 history closed usεr11852
kjetil b halvorsen
John
gung - Reinstate Monica
Tim
Duplicate of Comparing smoothing splines vs loess for smoothing?
Feb 14, 2016 at 20:52 comment added Alexis @metjush simple logistic regression invokes a specific functional form on the relationship between the DV and a linear combination of the IVs. The point of nonparametric smoothing regressions, such as GAMs and LOWESS, is to make no assumptions about the functional form(s) of the relationship(s) between the DV and IVs.
Feb 14, 2016 at 17:50 review Close votes
Feb 14, 2016 at 21:27
S Nov 17, 2015 at 21:25 history bounty ended CommunityBot
S Nov 17, 2015 at 21:25 history notice removed CommunityBot
Nov 15, 2015 at 21:15 comment added pir There aren't any issues in particular. The two methods can just produce quite different lines and confidence intervals. I will see if I can find a good example.
Nov 13, 2015 at 7:55 comment added Creosote It would be helpful if you posted at least one plot along with a comment describing the issues, as you see them, with the method that you're illustrating.
Nov 11, 2015 at 16:09 history edited pir CC BY-SA 3.0
deleted 1 character in body
Nov 9, 2015 at 21:23 history tweeted twitter.com/StackStats/status/663829403714109440
S Nov 9, 2015 at 19:51 history bounty started pir
S Nov 9, 2015 at 19:51 history notice added pir Draw attention
Nov 7, 2015 at 16:48 history edited pir
edited tags
Nov 7, 2015 at 16:02 history edited pir CC BY-SA 3.0
added 174 characters in body
Nov 7, 2015 at 15:05 comment added pir Yeah, I've tried logistic regression, LOESS and GAM. The logistic regression doesn't capture the relationship very well. However, I'm more interested in the general case than for my data specifically, which is why I haven't posted plots and data.
Nov 7, 2015 at 14:24 comment added metjush have you tried fitting a simple logistic regression to it and visualizing the sigmoid?
Nov 7, 2015 at 13:42 history asked pir CC BY-SA 3.0