Skip to main content
13 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jun 27, 2012 at 13:37 history edited Macro CC BY-SA 3.0
added 33 characters in body; edited tags
Jun 27, 2012 at 7:34 history tweeted twitter.com/#!/StackStats/status/217883577604521984
Nov 28, 2011 at 16:10 comment added whuber Thanks: the problem is getting clearer. I'm still not sure what exactly you mean by "check" the composition change over time and why that requires making all possible comparisons between species. Could you perhaps share a high-level description of your scientific objective for this analysis? Also, there is a preliminary issue concerning what a "population" is. I doubt you truly know the populations: these must either be estimates or summaries of observations, but which are they precisely? That will influence the interpretation of any analyses.
Nov 28, 2011 at 10:38 answer added Manuel Ebert timeline score: 1
Nov 18, 2011 at 16:21 comment added user7417 @whuber: It's population size (=number of individuals) of species per year (and they are bird species, by the way). The aim is to check species composition change over time. When there is directional change, then years further apart should show larger Hellinger distances than years closer together.
Nov 18, 2011 at 15:02 comment added whuber I cannot offer an alternative because I do not know what's in the data (what exactly has been recorded about these "species"?) and knowing the purpose of the analysis. Your research might be better served by reformulating the original question to provide this information.
Nov 18, 2011 at 14:31 comment added user7417 @whuber: I'd be eager to get a suggestion...
Nov 18, 2011 at 14:30 comment added user7417 @onestop: Dissimilarity between years were measured by Hellinger distance, that is, Euclidean distance of Hellinger transformed data. Hellinger transformation: N'ij = √(Nij/∑Nij) where Nij is the population size of species i in year j, and ∑Nij is the sum of individuals across all species in year j.
Nov 18, 2011 at 14:27 comment added user7417 @psj: My matrices consist of species (several dozens) in rows and years (25) in columns. For the MCPP I shuffle the column positions randomly (10,000 times).
Nov 17, 2011 at 16:05 comment added whuber Even the ordinary regression fit may be invalid because the $(n^2-n)/2$ points reflect at most $n$ independent observations, causing extreme interdependence. So, testing significance appears to be the least of the concerns here. It looks like you need a different approach to the analysis altogether.
Nov 17, 2011 at 15:44 comment added onestop ... and clarify what 'distance between years' means?
Nov 17, 2011 at 14:59 comment added psj can you give examples how your "species x year" matrices look like?
Nov 17, 2011 at 12:48 history asked user7417 CC BY-SA 3.0