Skip to main content
Tweeted twitter.com/StackStats/status/1536272182761889795
edited tags
Link
emeryville
  • 698
  • 1
  • 5
  • 18
Source Link
emeryville
  • 698
  • 1
  • 5
  • 18

Incidental parameter problem

I always struggle to get the true essence of the incidental parameter problem. I read in several occasions that the fixed effects estimators of nonlinear panel data models can be severely biased because of the "well-known" incidental parameter problem.

When I ask for a clear explanation of this problem the typical answer is: Assume that the panel data has N individuals over T time periods. If T is fixed, as N grows the covariate estimates become biased. This occurs because the number of nuisance parameters grow quickly as N increases.

I would greatly appreciate

  • a more precise but still simple explanation (if possible)
  • and/or a concrete example that I can work out with R or Stata.