Timeline for Parameter Inference when Model is a bad fit to the data.
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dec 14, 2015 at 4:31 | comment | added | erccarls | Now, we fit the model using by maximizing the poisson log-likelihood, and compare models using likelihood ratio tests, where $\Delta\chi^2=-2\Delta\ln(\mathcal{L})$. The problem is that this assumes that the biggest errors are statistical while there are large systematics which are very difficult to calculate. So I am looking for possible ways to characterize the unknown uncertainties without calculating a huge number of models (these are expensive simulations to run). | |
Dec 14, 2015 at 4:27 | comment | added | erccarls | Thanks for the response. I should have been more specific about what I am already doing and the data. The binning is such that the average number of counts per pixel is ~10 or so, depending on which part of the sky we are looking at. In any case, zero pixels are quite rare even with this fine binning. | |
Dec 11, 2015 at 14:51 | history | edited | user32398 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 4 characters in body
|
Dec 11, 2015 at 2:02 | history | edited | user32398 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 279 characters in body
|
Dec 11, 2015 at 1:55 | history | answered | user32398 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |