Timeline for Chi Square for this case?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 3, 2011 at 14:16 | comment | added | L_T | Because I need to know if GLOBALLY condition 1 is better, I don't want to know only the significance at stimulus level. Indeed I will have more than 3 stimuli in the real table I use. What do you mean with "making the design hierarchical"? Can you provide an example in R please, so I can understand what do you mean? | |
| Dec 3, 2011 at 8:33 | comment | added | ttnphns | Formally you can (despite that each respondent will be represented 3 times, making the design hierarchical). But I'd advice to do a separate test for each stimulus. They are something different. Why make a hodge-podge? | |
| Dec 3, 2011 at 1:16 | comment | added | L_T | Thanks a lot. Actually I want to know if globally the Condition 1 is chosen significantly more often than the other two combined, I mean considering all the stimuli. Can I simply do the binomial analysis summing together the values of the conditions separately (i.e. 27 vs 9)? Or are there some issues with the multiple comparisons? | |
| Dec 2, 2011 at 20:07 | history | answered | ttnphns | CC BY-SA 3.0 |