Timeline for Is there a near-exhaustive summary of statistical procedures?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 2, 2020 at 3:14 | vote | accept | Galen | ||
| Feb 21, 2016 at 1:03 | comment | added | Aksakal | It's called Google, it has everything | |
| Feb 21, 2016 at 0:36 | comment | added | Glen_b | In terms of specific test statistics, you may not find, say, this test which was made in response to the specific details in the question; it's an exact small sample test of means for a pair of exponentially distributed variates. I don't think I've seen it presented in any particular place but a decent statistics graduate should be able to come up with it. I wouldn't expect a laundry list will capture most of those sorts of cases. | |
| Feb 20, 2016 at 16:24 | comment | added | Galen | Realizing that 'near-exhaustive' is not likely, 'most you've heard of' is an acceptable compromise to me. I don't expect anyone to have near-encyclopedic knowledge, but I have seen statisticians show a breadth of understanding that I wish was more accessible. | |
| Feb 20, 2016 at 8:49 | comment | added | Glen_b | "most you've heard of" and "near exhaustive" are not in any way near to the same thing -- unless you're lucky enough to happen across someone with near-encyclopedic knowledge | |
| Feb 20, 2016 at 5:11 | answer | added | Sympa | timeline score: 4 | |
| Feb 20, 2016 at 4:58 | history | asked | Galen | CC BY-SA 3.0 |