Skip to main content
Bumped by Community user
light formatting
Source Link
gung - Reinstate Monica
  • 147.5k
  • 89
  • 406
  • 717

How can I spot if, say, a simple, linear regression will adequately describe some causal relationship purely from the model's output (say, from the command summary(lm( y ~x ))summary(lm( y ~x )) in R), as opposed to from looking at QQ plots or residual plots? Is it possible? Perhaps something to do with the estimated variance?

How can I spot if, say, a simple, linear regression will adequately describe some causal relationship purely from the model's output (say, from the command summary(lm( y ~x )) in R), as opposed to from looking at QQ plots or residual plots? Is it possible? Perhaps something to do with the estimated variance?

How can I spot if, say, a simple, linear regression will adequately describe some causal relationship purely from the model's output (say, from the command summary(lm( y ~x )) in R), as opposed to from looking at QQ plots or residual plots? Is it possible? Perhaps something to do with the estimated variance?

Source Link

Spot a bad linear regression fit from model output?

How can I spot if, say, a simple, linear regression will adequately describe some causal relationship purely from the model's output (say, from the command summary(lm( y ~x )) in R), as opposed to from looking at QQ plots or residual plots? Is it possible? Perhaps something to do with the estimated variance?