Timeline for On error probability bounds in Bayesian hypothesis testing
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Feb 23, 2013 at 7:38 | comment | added | M.B.M. | @DilipSarwate While the proof of (3) is not complicated, I just really appreciate someone taking the time to explain something. It is really helpful for us, novices, and I feel that not acknowledging it (even as a "helpful discussion") is unfair. So, thank you for clarification! (Btw, I may have solved my related question :)) | |
Feb 22, 2013 at 12:46 | comment | added | Dilip Sarwate | @M.B.M. Thanks for the kind words. While I derived (3) without referring to any books or journals as I was composing my answer, I very much doubt that it was the first time this approach has been used by anyone or that this derivation has never been published somewhere by someone. If you want to cite my derivation, you might want to first read what others on this forum think in this discussion on meta.stats.SE. | |
Feb 22, 2013 at 3:12 | comment | added | M.B.M. | @DilipSarwate I really like your derivation of (3), and (for citation purposes) I am wondering whether you obtained that on your own or whether it's in a book... I also just posted a related question... | |
Jan 2, 2012 at 16:39 | comment | added | Dilip Sarwate | I haven't thought the matter through or read the paper that you have cited, but perhaps for $M$-ary decision making when $M > 2$, the error probability expressions and bounds have different computational requirements? | |
Jan 1, 2012 at 15:51 | history | edited | Dilip Sarwate | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 1 characters in body
|
Jan 1, 2012 at 10:51 | comment | added | Michele | This is exactly what prompted my question: people seek for alternative expressions of (1) (see reference above for a review), but these expressions seem equivalent, at least computationally. | |
Dec 31, 2011 at 23:31 | history | answered | Dilip Sarwate | CC BY-SA 3.0 |