Timeline for Specifying prior for effect size in meta-analysis
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 1, 2018 at 17:18 | history | edited | mdewey |
Removed random-effects tag
|
|
| Dec 15, 2016 at 12:58 | answer | added | Giuseppe Biondi-Zoccai | timeline score: 3 | |
| S Nov 18, 2016 at 18:05 | history | suggested | Chill2Macht | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added mathjax formatting
|
| Nov 18, 2016 at 16:20 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Nov 18, 2016 at 18:05 | |||||
| Apr 6, 2016 at 3:01 | comment | added | stijn | A couple of straight-forward sensitivity tests would be to use student t distributions with 4 or 7 degrees of freedom and changing the scale of the distribution. If you suspect publication bias in your sample, these sensitivity tests will not tell you a lot. You can take publication bias into account in your prior. See the work of Joachim Vandekerckhove cogsci.uci.edu/~joachim/publications.php | |
| Apr 5, 2016 at 14:57 | history | edited | D_Williams | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
I removed RSTAN from the question
|
| Apr 5, 2016 at 9:32 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackStats/status/717283733150240769 | ||
| Apr 5, 2016 at 8:10 | history | edited | Tim | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited tags
|
| Apr 5, 2016 at 6:33 | history | edited | chl | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 7 characters in body
|
| Apr 5, 2016 at 4:51 | review | First posts | |||
| Apr 5, 2016 at 4:53 | |||||
| Apr 5, 2016 at 4:50 | history | asked | D_Williams | CC BY-SA 3.0 |