Timeline for Predict with pseudo-mean factors in new data
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Apr 30, 2016 at 8:40 | comment | added | Maarten Buis | There is nothing fake about those means, they are just proportions. It is not what I would use in such cases, but others are allowed to have different opinions. | |
Apr 29, 2016 at 14:12 | comment | added | Andrew | So it is not correct/best practice to use Stata's fake categorical means then, and instead make predictions at each factor level (or just select one level)? | |
Apr 29, 2016 at 13:30 | history | edited | Maarten Buis | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 1 character in body
|
Apr 29, 2016 at 10:39 | history | edited | Nick Cox | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 1 character in body
|
Apr 29, 2016 at 7:46 | history | answered | Maarten Buis | CC BY-SA 3.0 |