Timeline for Problem with singular covariance matrices when doing Gaussian process regression
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jan 16, 2012 at 11:04 | comment | added | Dikran Marsupial | The key trick to limiting numerical instability is on page 45 (equation 3.26). | |
Jan 16, 2012 at 9:56 | comment | added | Andreas | "there is a good discussion of this in Rasmussen and Williams book" - May i ask where exactly | |
Jan 13, 2012 at 15:24 | comment | added | Dikran Marsupial | The matrix is often ill-conditioned, so there are indeed a few tricks for inverting it more reliably, there is a good discussion of this in Rasmussen and Williams book. However, I have found that I normally only run into problems when model selection tries to make a very bland RBF covariance to model an essentially linear decision boundary, so you could argue it was model mis-specification? I haven't used GP regression very much, so it is hard to know whether it crops up more often there. | |
Jan 13, 2012 at 10:35 | comment | added | Andreas | I read in some publications about estimating the inverse for singular matrices. Is that a standard problem in gaussian process regression or why is there so much literature about numerical problems in the covariance matrices. | |
Jan 13, 2012 at 10:31 | vote | accept | Andreas | ||
Jan 13, 2012 at 10:02 | history | answered | Dikran Marsupial | CC BY-SA 3.0 |