Skip to main content
deleted 90 characters in body
Source Link
mkt
  • 20.4k
  • 11
  • 81
  • 187

You are correct; if c1c1 does not have a common meaning between patients, then electrode designation is not really a meaningful variable and it's better to think of them as multiple equivalent measurements on the same subject. So your second model is more appropriate.

[More of a comment, left as an answer because I don't have enough reputation to comment]

You are correct; if c1 does not have a common meaning between patients, then electrode designation is not really a meaningful variable and it's better to think of them as multiple equivalent measurements on the same subject. So your second model is more appropriate.

[More of a comment, left as an answer because I don't have enough reputation to comment]

You are correct; if c1 does not have a common meaning between patients, then electrode designation is not really a meaningful variable and it's better to think of them as multiple equivalent measurements on the same subject. So your second model is more appropriate.

Source Link
mkt
  • 20.4k
  • 11
  • 81
  • 187

You are correct; if c1 does not have a common meaning between patients, then electrode designation is not really a meaningful variable and it's better to think of them as multiple equivalent measurements on the same subject. So your second model is more appropriate.

[More of a comment, left as an answer because I don't have enough reputation to comment]