Revisions to Wikipedia entry on likelihood seems ambiguous

replaced http://stats.stackexchange.com/ with https://stats.stackexchange.com/

Source Link

edited Apr 13, 2017 at 12:44

1

I have a simple question regarding "conditional probability" and "Likelihood". (I have already surveyed this question here here but to no avail.)

Tweeted twitter.com/StackStats/status/757044185392377856

occurred Jul 24, 2016 at 2:46

added 175 characters in body

Source Link

edited Jul 21, 2016 at 1:59

Creatron

1.7k
2
20
24

EDIT III:

I extended @amoebas comments to the Bayesian case just now as well:

edited body

Source Link

edited Jul 20, 2016 at 7:05

amoeba

107.3k
36
321
347

Based on @ameobas@amoebas answer, I have drawn his last comment. I think it's quite elucidating, and I think it clears up the main contention I was having. (Comments on the image).

added 278 characters in body

Source Link

edited Jul 20, 2016 at 2:58

Creatron

1.7k
2
20
24

Loading

some MathJax improvements

Source Link

edit approved Jul 19, 2016 at 23:20

Michael Hardy

11.1k
1
33
56

Loading

edited tags

Link

edited Jul 19, 2016 at 12:05

Tim

141.2k
26
270
512

Loading

added 1708 characters in body

Source Link

edited Jul 18, 2016 at 21:36

Creatron

1.7k
2
20
24

Loading

edited body; edited tags; edited title

Source Link

edited Jul 18, 2016 at 19:31

amoeba

107.3k
36
321
347

Loading

deleted 26 characters in body

Source Link

edited Jul 18, 2016 at 19:27

Creatron

1.7k
2
20
24

Loading

edited body

Source Link

edited Jul 18, 2016 at 9:51

Tim

141.2k
26
270
512

Loading

added 705 characters in body; edited title

Source Link

edited Jul 18, 2016 at 9:45

Tim

141.2k
26
270
512

Loading

Source Link

asked Jul 15, 2016 at 23:44

Creatron

1.7k
2
20
24

Loading

Stack Exchange Network

Return to Question