Skip to main content

Timeline for Correlation between sine and cosine

Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0

17 events
when toggle format what by license comment
S Jul 17, 2016 at 19:22 history suggested Rodrigo de Azevedo CC BY-SA 3.0
Minor edits
Jul 17, 2016 at 18:42 review Suggested edits
S Jul 17, 2016 at 19:22
S Jul 17, 2016 at 15:32 history suggested J. M. is not a statistician CC BY-SA 3.0
some formatting tweaks
Jul 17, 2016 at 15:09 review Suggested edits
S Jul 17, 2016 at 15:32
Jul 16, 2016 at 23:27 history tweeted twitter.com/StackStats/status/754457416469798912
Jul 16, 2016 at 21:34 answer added Matthew Drury timeline score: 13
Jul 16, 2016 at 21:22 vote accept uklady
Jul 16, 2016 at 20:42 comment added Chris Well they are lagged correlated and each one is autocorrelated with itself!
Jul 16, 2016 at 18:50 comment added whuber If you do that, then you only need draw a scatterplot--no integration is necessary. That scatterplot is a uniform distribution on the unit circle (obviously). Since the circle is symmetric under any reflection through the origin, the correlation equals its negative, whence it must be zero, QED.
Jul 16, 2016 at 16:50 history edited Kodiologist CC BY-SA 3.0
Added the more precise question decided upon in the comments.
Jul 16, 2016 at 16:46 answer added Kodiologist timeline score: 24
Jul 16, 2016 at 16:23 comment added uklady Maybe I could take $[0, 2*pi]$ as the support (I would be assuming that $f=1$, so the interval contains one full cycle). I guess the integration problems will then vanish as well
Jul 16, 2016 at 16:21 comment added Kodiologist So you want $X$ uniformly distributed and then you define $Y = \sin X$ and $Z = \cos X$? That's fine except you also need to specify the support of $X$'s density, since there is no uniform distribution over the whole of $ℝ$, or any other infinitely long interval.
Jul 16, 2016 at 16:18 comment added uklady If I assume time is a uniform random variable ($X$ in my text), is it not possible to do this? I mean I would be then looking at the correlation of two transformed random variables.
Jul 16, 2016 at 16:16 comment added Kodiologist As stated, your problem is insufficiently defined. Correlation is a concept that applies to random variables, not functions. (Formally, a random variable is a kind of function, namely a measurable function from a probability space to the real numbers equipped with the Borel measure. But just saying "the sine function" doesn't tell you anything about the probability measure in the domain, which is what gets you probabilistic information, including joint distributions.)
Jul 16, 2016 at 16:11 review First posts
Jul 16, 2016 at 16:25
Jul 16, 2016 at 16:06 history asked uklady CC BY-SA 3.0