Skip to main content
corrected the MWE so that it actually works (lmerTest, an essential package, was not loaded) and fixed a typo.
Source Link
library("lmerTest")
lsmeans(model)
Least Squares Means table:
         gent Estimate Standard Error   DF t-value Lower CI Upper CI p-value    
gent  1   1.0    256.0           11.2  6.9    22.9      229      283  <2e-16 ***
gent  2   5.0    228.0           11.2  6.9    20.4      201      255  <2e-16 ***
gent  3   6.0    247.7           11.2  6.9    22.2      221      274  <2e-16 ***
gent  4   7.0    264.0           11.2  6.9    23.6      237      291  <2e-16 ***
gent  5   8.0    288.1           18.5  8.0    15.6      245      331  <2e-16 ***
gent  6   9.0    299.7           18.5  8.0    16.2      257      342  <2e-16 ***
gent  7  10.0    219.2           18.5  8.0    11.8      177      262  <2e-16 ***
gent  8  11.0    346.7           18.5  8.0    18.8      304      389  <2e-16 ***
gent  9  12.0    318.1           18.5  8.0    17.2      275      361  <2e-16 ***
gent  10  2.0    288.7           18.5  8.0    15.6      246      331  <2e-16 ***
gent  11  3.0    388.2           18.5  8.0    21.0      346      431  <2e-16 ***
gent  12  4.0    443.2           18.5  8.0    24.0      401      486  <2e-16 ***
---
Signif. codes:  0 ‘***’ 0.001 ‘**’ 0.01 ‘*’ 0.05 ‘.’ 0.1 ‘ ’ 1

In addition I am interesetedinterested in variance partitioning.

lsmeans(model)
Least Squares Means table:
         gent Estimate Standard Error   DF t-value Lower CI Upper CI p-value    
gent  1   1.0    256.0           11.2  6.9    22.9      229      283  <2e-16 ***
gent  2   5.0    228.0           11.2  6.9    20.4      201      255  <2e-16 ***
gent  3   6.0    247.7           11.2  6.9    22.2      221      274  <2e-16 ***
gent  4   7.0    264.0           11.2  6.9    23.6      237      291  <2e-16 ***
gent  5   8.0    288.1           18.5  8.0    15.6      245      331  <2e-16 ***
gent  6   9.0    299.7           18.5  8.0    16.2      257      342  <2e-16 ***
gent  7  10.0    219.2           18.5  8.0    11.8      177      262  <2e-16 ***
gent  8  11.0    346.7           18.5  8.0    18.8      304      389  <2e-16 ***
gent  9  12.0    318.1           18.5  8.0    17.2      275      361  <2e-16 ***
gent  10  2.0    288.7           18.5  8.0    15.6      246      331  <2e-16 ***
gent  11  3.0    388.2           18.5  8.0    21.0      346      431  <2e-16 ***
gent  12  4.0    443.2           18.5  8.0    24.0      401      486  <2e-16 ***
---
Signif. codes:  0 ‘***’ 0.001 ‘**’ 0.01 ‘*’ 0.05 ‘.’ 0.1 ‘ ’ 1

In addition I am intereseted in variance partitioning.

library("lmerTest")
lsmeans(model)
Least Squares Means table:
         gent Estimate Standard Error   DF t-value Lower CI Upper CI p-value    
gent  1   1.0    256.0           11.2  6.9    22.9      229      283  <2e-16 ***
gent  2   5.0    228.0           11.2  6.9    20.4      201      255  <2e-16 ***
gent  3   6.0    247.7           11.2  6.9    22.2      221      274  <2e-16 ***
gent  4   7.0    264.0           11.2  6.9    23.6      237      291  <2e-16 ***
gent  5   8.0    288.1           18.5  8.0    15.6      245      331  <2e-16 ***
gent  6   9.0    299.7           18.5  8.0    16.2      257      342  <2e-16 ***
gent  7  10.0    219.2           18.5  8.0    11.8      177      262  <2e-16 ***
gent  8  11.0    346.7           18.5  8.0    18.8      304      389  <2e-16 ***
gent  9  12.0    318.1           18.5  8.0    17.2      275      361  <2e-16 ***
gent  10  2.0    288.7           18.5  8.0    15.6      246      331  <2e-16 ***
gent  11  3.0    388.2           18.5  8.0    21.0      346      431  <2e-16 ***
gent  12  4.0    443.2           18.5  8.0    24.0      401      486  <2e-16 ***
---
Signif. codes:  0 ‘***’ 0.001 ‘**’ 0.01 ‘*’ 0.05 ‘.’ 0.1 ‘ ’ 1

In addition I am interested in variance partitioning.

Source Link
Crops
  • 477
  • 9
  • 20

Extract the different components of variance in a linear mixed model in R

Consider a mixed model as follows.

library(lme4)
# Load data
data <- structure(list(blk = c(1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3L),
                       gent = c(1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 11, 12, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 9, 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 6, 10L),
                       yld = c(83, 77, 78, 78, 70, 75, 74, 79, 81, 81, 91, 79, 78, 92, 79, 87, 81, 96, 89, 82L),
                       syld = c(250, 240, 268, 287, 226, 395, 450, 260, 220, 237, 227, 281, 311, 258, 224, 238, 278, 347, 300, 289L)),
                  .Names = c("blk", "gent", "yld", "syld"), class = "data.frame", row.names = c(NA, -20L))
data$blk <- as.factor(data$blk)
data$gent <- as.factor(data$gent)

The data is unbalanced.

# Mixed effect model
frmla <- "syld ~ 1 + gent + (1|blk)"
library(lme4)
model <- lmer(formula(frmla), data = data)

model
Linear mixed model fit by REML ['merModLmerTest']
Formula: syld ~ 1 + gent + (1 | blk)
   Data: data
REML criterion at convergence: 73.9572
Random effects:
 Groups   Name        Std.Dev.
 blk      (Intercept)  9.385  
 Residual             16.919  
Number of obs: 20, groups:  blk, 3
Fixed Effects:
(Intercept)        gent2        gent3        gent4        gent5        gent6        gent7        gent8        gent9  
    256.000      -28.000       -8.333        8.000       32.127       43.678      -36.805       90.678       62.127  
     gent10       gent11       gent12  
     32.678      132.195      187.195  

Primarily I want to compare the gent levels by LS means.

lsmeans(model)
Least Squares Means table:
         gent Estimate Standard Error   DF t-value Lower CI Upper CI p-value    
gent  1   1.0    256.0           11.2  6.9    22.9      229      283  <2e-16 ***
gent  2   5.0    228.0           11.2  6.9    20.4      201      255  <2e-16 ***
gent  3   6.0    247.7           11.2  6.9    22.2      221      274  <2e-16 ***
gent  4   7.0    264.0           11.2  6.9    23.6      237      291  <2e-16 ***
gent  5   8.0    288.1           18.5  8.0    15.6      245      331  <2e-16 ***
gent  6   9.0    299.7           18.5  8.0    16.2      257      342  <2e-16 ***
gent  7  10.0    219.2           18.5  8.0    11.8      177      262  <2e-16 ***
gent  8  11.0    346.7           18.5  8.0    18.8      304      389  <2e-16 ***
gent  9  12.0    318.1           18.5  8.0    17.2      275      361  <2e-16 ***
gent  10  2.0    288.7           18.5  8.0    15.6      246      331  <2e-16 ***
gent  11  3.0    388.2           18.5  8.0    21.0      346      431  <2e-16 ***
gent  12  4.0    443.2           18.5  8.0    24.0      401      486  <2e-16 ***
---
Signif. codes:  0 ‘***’ 0.001 ‘**’ 0.01 ‘*’ 0.05 ‘.’ 0.1 ‘ ’ 1

In addition I am intereseted in variance partitioning.

The variance component due to random effect and residual can be estimated as follows.

VCrandom <- VarCorr(model)
print(VCrandom, comp = "Variance")
 Groups   Name        Variance
 blk      (Intercept)  88.083 
 Residual             286.250

How to partition the total variance into components due to each of the factors gent and blk along with the residual ? Something similar to the output given by PROC MIXED of SAS, where MSE is computed even when estimation is by ML or REML instead of least squares.

Should I treat the fixed effect as random just for the purpouse of getting variance component ?

frmla2 <- "syld ~ 1 + (1|gent) + (1|blk)"
model2 <- lmer(formula(frmla2), data = data)
model2

VCrandom2 <- VarCorr(model2)
print(VCrandom2, comp = "Variance")
 Groups   Name        Variance
 gent     (Intercept) 4152.08 
 blk      (Intercept)  116.11 
 Residual              274.92 

If there is no random effect, variance components can be estimated using the least squares approach (ANOVA, Sum of squares, MSE).

The package mixlm has provision for variance partitioning using SS in case of mixed models.

library(mixlm)

mixlm <- lm(syld ~ 1 + r(gent) + r(blk), data)

Anova(mixlm, type="III")

Analysis of variance (unrestricted model)
Response: syld
          Mean Sq   Sum Sq Df F value Pr(>F)
gent      5360.49 58965.36 11   18.73 0.0009
blk        638.58  1277.17  2    2.23 0.1886
Residuals  286.25  1717.50  6       -      -

            Err.term(s) Err.df VC(SS)
1 gent              (3)      6 3044.5
2 blk               (3)      6   52.8
3 Residuals           -      -  286.3
(VC = variance component)

               Expected mean squares
gent      (3) + 1.66666666666667 (1)
blk       (3) + 6.66666666666667 (2)
Residuals (3)                       

WARNING: Unbalanced data may lead to poor estimates

The estimates are different

# Total variance
var(data$syld)

|source   |  model1|  model2|  mixlm|
|:--------|-------:|-------:|------:|
|gent     |      NA| 4152.08| 3044.5|
|blk      |  88.083|  116.11|   52.8|
|Residual | 286.250|  274.92|  286.3|

Can fixed effect variance be extracted using predict function as suggested here In R: How to extract the different components of variance in a linear mixed model! ?

var(predict(model))

Which is the most appropriate method compatible with (RE)ML estimates in lme4 ?