Skip to main content
replaced http://stats.stackexchange.com/ with https://stats.stackexchange.com/
Source Link

I looked into the Gamut Constraint Method from the very helpful postpost by D.W. below. This was at first sight very promising as a pre-processing step to transform the image and the separate coin objects to colours that are independent of lighting conditions. However, even this technique does not work perfectly (and involves a library of images/histograms for mappings – which I don’t want to get into) and neither does the much more complex Neural Network Architecture methodologies. In fact this paper states in the abstract that:

The answeranswer by AVB was also helpful and I have looked into LAB* briefly.

I looked into the Gamut Constraint Method from the very helpful post by D.W. below. This was at first sight very promising as a pre-processing step to transform the image and the separate coin objects to colours that are independent of lighting conditions. However, even this technique does not work perfectly (and involves a library of images/histograms for mappings – which I don’t want to get into) and neither does the much more complex Neural Network Architecture methodologies. In fact this paper states in the abstract that:

The answer by AVB was also helpful and I have looked into LAB* briefly.

I looked into the Gamut Constraint Method from the very helpful post by D.W. below. This was at first sight very promising as a pre-processing step to transform the image and the separate coin objects to colours that are independent of lighting conditions. However, even this technique does not work perfectly (and involves a library of images/histograms for mappings – which I don’t want to get into) and neither does the much more complex Neural Network Architecture methodologies. In fact this paper states in the abstract that:

The answer by AVB was also helpful and I have looked into LAB* briefly.

Formula edit.
Source Link
MoonKnight
  • 707
  • 10
  • 22

I looked into the Gamut Constraint Method from the very helpful post by D.W. below. This was at first sight very promising as a pre-processing step to transform the image and the separate coin objects to colours that are independent of lighting conditions. However, even this technique does not work perfectly (and involves a library of images/histograms for mappings – which I don’t want to get into) and neither does the much more complex Neural Network Architecture methodologies. In fact this paper states in the abstract that: "current machine colour constancy algorithms are not good enough for colour-based object recognition.". That

"current machine colour constancy algorithms are not good enough for colour-based 
 object recognition.".

That is not to say that there aren’t much more up-to-date papers on this subject out there, but I can't find them and it does not seem to be a very active research area at this time.

"The nonlinear relations for L*, a*, and b* are intended to mimic the nonlinear  
response of the eye. Furthermore, uniform changes of components in the L*a*b* colour  
space aim to correspond to uniform changes in perceived colour, so the relative  
perceptual differences between any two colours in L*a*b* can be approximated by  
treating each colour as a point in a three dimensional space."

I looked into the Gamut Constraint Method from the very helpful post by D.W. below. This was at first sight very promising as a pre-processing step to transform the image and the separate coin objects to colours that are independent of lighting conditions. However, even this technique does not work perfectly (and involves a library of images/histograms for mappings – which I don’t want to get into) and neither does the much more complex Neural Network Architecture methodologies. In fact this paper states in the abstract that: "current machine colour constancy algorithms are not good enough for colour-based object recognition.". That is not to say that there aren’t much more up-to-date papers on this subject out there, but I can't find them and it does not seem to be a very active research area at this time.

"The nonlinear relations for L*, a*, and b* are intended to mimic the nonlinear response of the eye. Furthermore, uniform changes of components in the L*a*b* colour space aim to correspond to uniform changes in perceived colour, so the relative perceptual differences between any two colours in L*a*b* can be approximated by treating each colour as a point in a three dimensional space."

I looked into the Gamut Constraint Method from the very helpful post by D.W. below. This was at first sight very promising as a pre-processing step to transform the image and the separate coin objects to colours that are independent of lighting conditions. However, even this technique does not work perfectly (and involves a library of images/histograms for mappings – which I don’t want to get into) and neither does the much more complex Neural Network Architecture methodologies. In fact this paper states in the abstract that:

"current machine colour constancy algorithms are not good enough for colour-based 
 object recognition.".

That is not to say that there aren’t much more up-to-date papers on this subject out there, but I can't find them and it does not seem to be a very active research area at this time.

"The nonlinear relations for L*, a*, and b* are intended to mimic the nonlinear 
response of the eye. Furthermore, uniform changes of components in the L*a*b* colour 
space aim to correspond to uniform changes in perceived colour, so the relative  
perceptual differences between any two colours in L*a*b* can be approximated by  
treating each colour as a point in a three dimensional space."
Notice removed Authoritative reference needed by MoonKnight
Bounty Ended with AVB's answer chosen by MoonKnight
Summary
Source Link
MoonKnight
  • 707
  • 10
  • 22

Edit 1

Note: I have tried all of the ideas discussed below and have achieved next to nothing. Variance in lighting conditions (even within the same image) make this problem very tough and should be taken into consideration.

Edit 2 (Summery of Outcome)

Thank you for your answers. Further research of my own (including your answers and comments) has highlighted just how tough this problem is to deal with in the generic case of arbitrary lighting, arbitrary camera (mobile device), fluctuation in coin colour (even for same species/type) etc. I first looked at skin colour recognition (a very active field of research) as a starting point and there are still numerous problems even with the recognition of skin colour for Caucasians alone (see this paper for a review of the current techniques), and the fact that this problem contains three distinct colour objects all of which can have continuous and varying chromacities make this topic of computer vision a very hard one to classify and deal with accordingly (in fact you could do a good Ph.D. on it!).

I looked into the Gamut Constraint Method from the very helpful post by D.W. below. This was at first sight very promising as a pre-processing step to transform the image and the separate coin objects to colours that are independent of lighting conditions. However, even this technique does not work perfectly (and involves a library of images/histograms for mappings – which I don’t want to get into) and neither does the much more complex Neural Network Architecture methodologies. In fact this paper states in the abstract that: "current machine colour constancy algorithms are not good enough for colour-based object recognition.". That is not to say that there aren’t much more up-to-date papers on this subject out there, but I can't find them and it does not seem to be a very active research area at this time.

The answer by AVB was also helpful and I have looked into LAB* briefly.

"The nonlinear relations for L*, a*, and b* are intended to mimic the nonlinear response of the eye. Furthermore, uniform changes of components in the L*a*b* colour space aim to correspond to uniform changes in perceived colour, so the relative perceptual differences between any two colours in L*a*b* can be approximated by treating each colour as a point in a three dimensional space."

From what I have read, the transformation to this colour space for my device dependent images will be tricky - but I will look into this in detail (with a view to some sort of implementation) when I have a bit more time.

I am not holding my breath for a concrete solution to this problem and after the attempt with LAB* I shall be neglecting coin colour and looking to sure-up my current geometric detection algorithms (accurate Elliptic Hough Transform etc.).

Thanks you all. And as a end note to this question, here is the same image with a new geometric detection algorithm, which has no colour recognition:

enter image description here

Edit

Note: I have tried all of the ideas discussed below and have achieved next to nothing. Variance in lighting conditions (even within the same image) make this problem very tough and should be taken into consideration.

Edit 1

Note: I have tried all of the ideas discussed below and have achieved next to nothing. Variance in lighting conditions (even within the same image) make this problem very tough and should be taken into consideration.

Edit 2 (Summery of Outcome)

Thank you for your answers. Further research of my own (including your answers and comments) has highlighted just how tough this problem is to deal with in the generic case of arbitrary lighting, arbitrary camera (mobile device), fluctuation in coin colour (even for same species/type) etc. I first looked at skin colour recognition (a very active field of research) as a starting point and there are still numerous problems even with the recognition of skin colour for Caucasians alone (see this paper for a review of the current techniques), and the fact that this problem contains three distinct colour objects all of which can have continuous and varying chromacities make this topic of computer vision a very hard one to classify and deal with accordingly (in fact you could do a good Ph.D. on it!).

I looked into the Gamut Constraint Method from the very helpful post by D.W. below. This was at first sight very promising as a pre-processing step to transform the image and the separate coin objects to colours that are independent of lighting conditions. However, even this technique does not work perfectly (and involves a library of images/histograms for mappings – which I don’t want to get into) and neither does the much more complex Neural Network Architecture methodologies. In fact this paper states in the abstract that: "current machine colour constancy algorithms are not good enough for colour-based object recognition.". That is not to say that there aren’t much more up-to-date papers on this subject out there, but I can't find them and it does not seem to be a very active research area at this time.

The answer by AVB was also helpful and I have looked into LAB* briefly.

"The nonlinear relations for L*, a*, and b* are intended to mimic the nonlinear response of the eye. Furthermore, uniform changes of components in the L*a*b* colour space aim to correspond to uniform changes in perceived colour, so the relative perceptual differences between any two colours in L*a*b* can be approximated by treating each colour as a point in a three dimensional space."

From what I have read, the transformation to this colour space for my device dependent images will be tricky - but I will look into this in detail (with a view to some sort of implementation) when I have a bit more time.

I am not holding my breath for a concrete solution to this problem and after the attempt with LAB* I shall be neglecting coin colour and looking to sure-up my current geometric detection algorithms (accurate Elliptic Hough Transform etc.).

Thanks you all. And as a end note to this question, here is the same image with a new geometric detection algorithm, which has no colour recognition:

enter image description here

Extension to outline the approaches I have attempted.
Source Link
MoonKnight
  • 707
  • 10
  • 22
Loading
Notice added Authoritative reference needed by MoonKnight
Bounty Started worth 150 reputation by MoonKnight
added 20 characters in body
Source Link
MoonKnight
  • 707
  • 10
  • 22
Loading
edited title
Link
user88
user88
Loading
Tweeted twitter.com/#!/StackStats/status/171966538918793217
Source Link
MoonKnight
  • 707
  • 10
  • 22
Loading