Skip to main content
corrected math typo
Source Link
Alecos Papadopoulos
  • 60.8k
  • 8
  • 154
  • 278

Indeed, it is a known erratum of this book (see its website in the errata .pdf), that the specific lemma does not state the moment-boundedness condition $$\exists \; \delta : E(|z_n^{s+\delta}|) < M < \infty\;\; \forall n$$$$\exists \; \delta : E(|z_n|^{s+\delta}) < M < \infty\;\; \forall n$$

Indeed, it is a known erratum of this book (see its website in the errata .pdf), that the specific lemma does not state the moment-boundedness condition $$\exists \; \delta : E(|z_n^{s+\delta}|) < M < \infty\;\; \forall n$$

Indeed, it is a known erratum of this book (see its website in the errata .pdf), that the specific lemma does not state the moment-boundedness condition $$\exists \; \delta : E(|z_n|^{s+\delta}) < M < \infty\;\; \forall n$$

Source Link
Alecos Papadopoulos
  • 60.8k
  • 8
  • 154
  • 278

Indeed, it is a known erratum of this book (see its website in the errata .pdf), that the specific lemma does not state the moment-boundedness condition $$\exists \; \delta : E(|z_n^{s+\delta}|) < M < \infty\;\; \forall n$$