Timeline for I have significant differences detected in my glmer model summary but not in my mcp (Tukey) multiple comparisons summary. Why?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S Apr 20, 2019 at 4:43 | history | suggested | Todd D. Johnson | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
fixed grammar and some odd spacing
|
| Apr 19, 2019 at 23:24 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Apr 20, 2019 at 4:43 | |||||
| Nov 29, 2016 at 21:33 | vote | accept | mmontgomery | ||
| Nov 29, 2016 at 1:25 | comment | added | mmontgomery | Thank you for your answer. To clarify, I should ignore the adjusted pvalue of the Tukey test and focus on the z value which shows significant differences between HON-BUFF and KB-BUFF in the results for both mcp and glmer, correct? Is the high Pr(>|z|) from the mcp a result of lowering the critical value for the individual pair comparisons in order to maintain an overall critical value of 0.05 for all comparosons/for the overall model? | |
| Nov 24, 2016 at 10:10 | history | answered | user10619 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |