Timeline for Mixed model in R and SPSS - different degree of freedom
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 8, 2022 at 21:00 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackStats/status/1600958415639027733 | ||
| Dec 15, 2016 at 2:45 | history | edited | Mary. C | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 443 characters in body
|
| Dec 15, 2016 at 2:36 | comment | added | Mary. C | I realized that I did not mention important information: Number of samples in my data is 23. Five samples each for 5 subgroups (specified as “exp” in the code), with two missing data. Sample size is rather small, and this might have caused a problem. As Satterthwaite method use variance to approximate degree of freedom, I am thinking that the way variance is calculated differs between SPSS and R, but I have not learned enough about this. | |
| Dec 15, 2016 at 2:30 | comment | added | Mary. C | Dear Niek, Thank you very much for your reply. I am sorry for my mistake. Amy and Amymed is the same data. I corrected the description in my question. | |
| Dec 15, 2016 at 2:30 | history | edited | Mary. C | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 3 characters in body
|
| Dec 14, 2016 at 8:30 | comment | added | Niek | Are Amymed and Amy the same variables? I'm not that familiar with SPSS syntax but it seems to use Amymed instead of Amy. Sharing the output of both models and a summary of your data might help answer your question | |
| Dec 14, 2016 at 7:47 | history | edited | Roland | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 52 characters in body
|
| Dec 13, 2016 at 7:33 | history | asked | Mary. C | CC BY-SA 3.0 |