Skip to main content
5 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Mar 30, 2012 at 20:45 vote accept dsimcha
Mar 30, 2012 at 20:44 comment added cardinal Ok, perhaps I am tired or this is some regional usage difference? I would interpret the implications of the statements "A bat is not obviously a bird" and "A bat is obviously not a bird" as very different, for example.
Mar 30, 2012 at 20:38 comment added Henry @cardinal: my wording was deliberate, but feel free to read it your way: "obviously not" is a subset of "not obviously" and I am prone to understatement to make a point.
Mar 30, 2012 at 20:30 comment added cardinal Maybe this is a language issue of mine or I'm just misreading your answer, but did you mean "not obviously" or "obviously not"?
Mar 30, 2012 at 19:56 history answered Henry CC BY-SA 3.0