Skip to main content
9 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Feb 5, 2017 at 4:23 comment added Arpit Sisodia I got you. You are right. Thanks a lot. @Anony-Mousse.
Feb 4, 2017 at 18:49 comment added Has QUIT--Anony-Mousse Sum of squares must not be compared across different normalization or data. As written above, scale your data set with a tiny constant close to zero to 'fake news" improve your scores.
Feb 4, 2017 at 4:32 comment added Arpit Sisodia I have seen bss/tss to compare my and others results. They have got it better.
Jan 29, 2017 at 8:43 comment added Has QUIT--Anony-Mousse How do you compare to your colleagues to decide what is better? I wouldn't be surprised if your solution becomes 'better' if you simply scale everything with 0.01 - indicating that the evaluation criteria is bad.
Jan 29, 2017 at 8:41 comment added Has QUIT--Anony-Mousse Sensitivity to scaling is a well-known drawback of k-means, so it should be included in the answers there.
Jan 29, 2017 at 6:24 comment added Arpit Sisodia @Anony -Mousse, yes, your answer of "drawbacks of K-means" is related to the my question, but at the same time how different scaling techniques would change the clustering results is what I am looking for. Actually, in my data science team only other people have got better clusters just by having different scaling techniques. So i wanted to know the reason. Also i am not very expert in the field so may be could't post question in right way but drawbacks related to scaling and different scaling effecting clustering results are indeed not exactly the same questions. :)
Jan 28, 2017 at 9:22 history closed Has QUIT--Anony-Mousse clustering Duplicate of How to understand the drawbacks of K-means
Jan 28, 2017 at 7:44 answer added Has QUIT--Anony-Mousse timeline score: 1
Jan 28, 2017 at 4:50 history asked Arpit Sisodia CC BY-SA 3.0