Timeline for Statistical tests for low sample numbers in both indendent groups (n=3 and n=1)
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 10, 2012 at 15:36 | comment | added | Peter Flom | Not that I can see. | |
| Apr 10, 2012 at 12:21 | answer | added | MånsT | timeline score: 4 | |
| Apr 10, 2012 at 12:11 | comment | added | sirlark | @peter: I can't make an assumption about a given protein's quantification being normally distributed across channels 1,2, and 3 with my data alone, but I might be able to confirm this from other/previous research datasets. Would that be reasonable? Otherwise, is there anything I can do with this? | |
| Apr 10, 2012 at 12:08 | comment | added | sirlark | Having re-read after a lunch break, I realized the question wasn't very clear as far as the explanation of the experimental design was concerned. I've edited and added quite a bit for clarification. Hope it helps. | |
| Apr 10, 2012 at 12:03 | history | edited | sirlark | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
typos and corrected ratio forumla to use channels instead of groups and channels so it's more clear
|
| Apr 10, 2012 at 11:55 | history | edited | sirlark | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Clarified experimental design, explaing pools
|
| Apr 10, 2012 at 11:06 | comment | added | Peter Flom | With n = 3 and n = 1, no nonparametric test is going to show significance, I think, no matter what the values are. You would have to make some strong assumptions about the group of 3. | |
| Apr 10, 2012 at 10:34 | history | asked | sirlark | CC BY-SA 3.0 |