Timeline for Test of independence with three levels on 6 observations on a 1-7 Likert rating
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
26 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Feb 4, 2022 at 17:00 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
Jul 5, 2021 at 23:02 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
Mar 4, 2021 at 17:04 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
Oct 27, 2020 at 16:01 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
Jun 27, 2020 at 20:03 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
Jan 29, 2020 at 19:00 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
Sep 27, 2019 at 3:01 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
May 31, 2017 at 16:55 | answer | added | raumkundschafter | timeline score: 0 | |
Feb 17, 2017 at 17:29 | comment | added | raumkundschafter | @WeiwenNg the observations (a-f) are measurements or observations done by one person although not really repeated measures as they are different. I edited the example to be less abstract in the hopes that clarifies things a bit more. | |
Feb 17, 2017 at 17:22 | history | edited | raumkundschafter | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Making the example more concrete
|
S Feb 17, 2017 at 16:11 | history | suggested | luchonacho | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
no need to mention edit
|
Feb 17, 2017 at 15:11 | review | Suggested edits | |||
S Feb 17, 2017 at 16:11 | |||||
Feb 17, 2017 at 14:44 | comment | added | Weiwen Ng | I don't see a contingency table as being appropriate for this. I am not even sure what the data are supposed to represent. Are your observations (i.e. your rows) repeated measurements on a person, such that each person has 3 units (which you refer to as levels)? If not, what are the levels? You can use something like Spearman's correlation, which is rank-based, to get a sense of how the ratings correlate among the observations, if that's what you want (actually, because your data are already ordinal, Spearman may = Pearson in this case, but don't quote me on that). | |
Feb 17, 2017 at 14:35 | history | edited | raumkundschafter | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited body
|
Feb 17, 2017 at 13:00 | history | edited | raumkundschafter | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Correct spelling errors
|
Feb 17, 2017 at 12:35 | comment | added | raumkundschafter | @mdewey your indications helped to refactor the question. Due to my current understanding it's a 3 by 6 by 7 contingency table to deal with. | |
Feb 17, 2017 at 12:29 | history | edited | raumkundschafter | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Refactured the question and taking the comments into account to make the intend clearer
|
Feb 16, 2017 at 19:01 | comment | added | raumkundschafter | Thanks for moving this on. My wording might be a bit byte confusing and I aim to change the description above asa I know how to put it better. For the time being I made an edit that hopefully contributes to clarify the question. | |
Feb 16, 2017 at 19:00 | history | edited | raumkundschafter | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Trying to make the terminology more clearer to clarify the intend
|
Feb 16, 2017 at 16:13 | comment | added | mdewey | Are you asking what to do with a 3 by 2 by 7 contingency table? | |
Feb 16, 2017 at 13:30 | history | edited | gung - Reinstate Monica |
added tags
|
|
Feb 15, 2017 at 13:45 | comment | added | Firebug | While asking for R implementation is off-topic, the question asks for a suitable test, so sounds on-topic to me. | |
Feb 15, 2017 at 1:09 | review | Close votes | |||
Feb 16, 2017 at 13:30 | |||||
Feb 15, 2017 at 0:52 | history | edited | Michael R. Chernick | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited title
|
Feb 15, 2017 at 0:06 | history | migrated | from stackoverflow.com (revisions) | ||
Feb 14, 2017 at 23:31 | history | asked | raumkundschafter | CC BY-SA 3.0 |