Timeline for Frequentist reasoning and conditioning on observations (example from Wagenmakers et al.)
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sep 8, 2019 at 1:05 | history | edited | kjetil b halvorsen♦ |
edited tags
|
|
Dec 19, 2015 at 16:36 | history | edited | amoeba | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
replaced [basic-concept] tag which was the only tag on this question (as part of the cleanup before requesting to burninate this tag)
|
Apr 14, 2012 at 9:54 | history | edited | Mike Lawrence | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Wagen, not Wagon
|
Apr 12, 2012 at 1:41 | vote | accept | Xodarap | ||
Apr 12, 2012 at 1:40 | vote | accept | Xodarap | ||
Apr 12, 2012 at 1:41 | |||||
Apr 12, 2012 at 1:35 | comment | added | Cyan | All three of the current answers are very good. I would add only that Wagenmakers is making a strawman argument in the sense that no frequentist statistician would ever recommend this confidence interval -- it exists in the literature only as an example of a pathological confidence interval. From a frequentist point of view, it demonstrates that confidence coverage alone is not sufficient for good inference. (I'm a Bayesian.) | |
Apr 12, 2012 at 1:25 | vote | accept | Xodarap | ||
Apr 12, 2012 at 1:40 | |||||
Apr 11, 2012 at 23:47 | answer | added | StasK | timeline score: 14 | |
Apr 11, 2012 at 23:34 | answer | added | Henry | timeline score: 5 | |
Apr 11, 2012 at 22:02 | answer | added | gung - Reinstate Monica | timeline score: 11 | |
Apr 11, 2012 at 21:26 | history | asked | Xodarap | CC BY-SA 3.0 |