Timeline for The Two Cultures: statistics vs. machine learning?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 1, 2015 at 0:05 | comment | added | Ian Warburton | I enjoyed this pithy answer. | |
| Jun 7, 2013 at 6:42 | comment | added | Gala | @StasK I think you make some important points, why not try to make them a bit less aggressively? | |
| May 7, 2012 at 3:25 | comment | added | StasK | @AndyW, this is, of course, an exaggeration of what I see around. A failure to think ahead statistically is true of academic world, too: the replicability of published results in psychology or medical sciences is at most 25% (see, e.g., simplystatistics.tumblr.com/post/21326470429/…) rather than the nominal 95%. The OP wanted statistics to embrace computer science; maybe computer science should embrace some statistics, and I gave the reasons why. | |
| May 6, 2012 at 14:58 | comment | added | Andy W | I've downvoted this answer. Although with a question such as this it will inevitably involve some personal opinions, IMO we should strive for some more substantive critique. This just comes off as a rant. | |
| S May 5, 2012 at 16:59 | history | answered | StasK | CC BY-SA 3.0 | |
| S May 5, 2012 at 16:59 | history | made wiki | Post Made Community Wiki by StasK |