Timeline for Acceptance ratio in Metropolis–Hastings algorithm
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
3 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
May 7, 2012 at 3:17 | comment | added | Drew | Another way to think about it is as follows: when $\sigma^2$ is large, most of your proposals ($x_j$) will have low density under the target distribution (for the reasons described above -- is that part okay?). Very rarely you will propose a value with high density under the proposal, and when this happens you will almost certainly accept it. Once there, you continue proposing unlikely values; since you rarely accept one of them, you just "stay" at your current, high-density sample for many iterations. | |
May 7, 2012 at 2:46 | comment | added | Tim | +1. Thanks! When $\sigma^2$ is large, I am still not sure why $\pi(x_i)$ is usually big while $\pi(x_j)$ usually small? Can your reason that $\pi(x_j)$ is small apply to $\pi(x_i)$ and your reason that $\pi(x_i)$ big apply to $\pi(x_j)$? | |
May 7, 2012 at 1:57 | history | answered | Drew | CC BY-SA 3.0 |