Skip to main content
edited tags
Link
amoeba
  • 107.2k
  • 36
  • 321
  • 346
de italisized asterisks
Source Link
gung - Reinstate Monica
  • 147.5k
  • 89
  • 406
  • 717

I have two groups of subjects, both undergoing two experimental conditions, and data are collected at three time points. I am interested in the timecond and the timecondgroup interactions. When I don't include the grouptimetime*cond and the time*cond*group interactions. When I don't include the group*time interaction, the three-way interaction is significant. However, when the non-interesting group*time interaction is included in the model, the three-way interaction is no longer significant.

Why does this happen and which analysis is correct?

I have two groups of subjects, both undergoing two experimental conditions, and data are collected at three time points. I am interested in the timecond and the timecondgroup interactions. When I don't include the grouptime interaction, the three-way interaction is significant. However, when the non-interesting group*time interaction is included in the model, the three-way interaction is no longer significant.

Why does this happen and which analysis is correct?

I have two groups of subjects, both undergoing two experimental conditions, and data are collected at three time points. I am interested in the time*cond and the time*cond*group interactions. When I don't include the group*time interaction, the three-way interaction is significant. However, when the non-interesting group*time interaction is included in the model, the three-way interaction is no longer significant.

Why does this happen and which analysis is correct?

Source Link

two and three-way interactions in a mixed within-between design

I have two groups of subjects, both undergoing two experimental conditions, and data are collected at three time points. I am interested in the timecond and the timecondgroup interactions. When I don't include the grouptime interaction, the three-way interaction is significant. However, when the non-interesting group*time interaction is included in the model, the three-way interaction is no longer significant.

Why does this happen and which analysis is correct?