Timeline for Multivariate time series model evaluation with conditional moments
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
30 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 15, 2017 at 8:25 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Sep 9, 2017 at 1:17 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Aug 4, 2017 at 6:07 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Jul 1, 2017 at 8:21 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| May 25, 2017 at 7:53 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Apr 23, 2017 at 12:26 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Mar 23, 2017 at 2:13 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Feb 17, 2017 at 9:43 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Jan 15, 2017 at 14:57 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackStats/status/820646148675354624 | ||
| Jan 14, 2017 at 20:51 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Dec 11, 2016 at 21:59 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Nov 2, 2016 at 15:42 | comment | added | John | @Taylor No worries. Can't hurt to have additional eyes on these things sometimes. | |
| Nov 2, 2016 at 15:32 | comment | added | Taylor | @John my fault I didn't see the datestamp | |
| Nov 2, 2016 at 12:40 | comment | added | John | @Taylor The idea was that I cared about the density as much as the mean. This question was from a few years ago. Nowadays I would probably use WAIC or Leave one out cross validation. | |
| Nov 2, 2016 at 3:43 | comment | added | Taylor | Why would you compare means and covariances between models, where one is such that you know it's true? Or are you trying to say you're knowingly fitting 'wrong' models on (real or simulated) data, and trying to come up with a routine that flags when something is wrong or when the model is dangerous or unsuitable or fits poorly? Is this for a trading strategy? | |
| Nov 2, 2016 at 3:22 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Oct 1, 2016 at 14:38 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Aug 30, 2016 at 14:20 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Jul 30, 2016 at 17:01 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Jun 27, 2016 at 12:14 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| May 28, 2016 at 5:08 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Jun 8, 2012 at 20:34 | history | notice removed | CommunityBot | ||
| Jun 8, 2012 at 20:34 | history | bounty ended | CommunityBot | ||
| Jun 4, 2012 at 16:23 | comment | added | John | I got +100 reputation for joining since I have more reputation on another stackexchange site. Since the question is important, figured it couldn't hurt. | |
| Jun 4, 2012 at 10:36 | history | edited | user88 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited title
|
| Jun 3, 2012 at 21:11 | answer | added | user3303 | timeline score: 2 | |
| Jun 1, 2012 at 19:26 | comment | added | Michael R. Chernick | I don't get why you are throwing away essentially all the reputation you have accumulated so far to hope for an answer to this. The reason it is not getting attention is probably because it is so specicalized that no one who has seen it thus far has the expertise to answer it. If you get no answer for the next six days you lose 50 reputation points and get no benefit. | |
| May 31, 2012 at 18:51 | history | notice added | John | Draw attention | |
| May 31, 2012 at 18:51 | history | bounty started | John | ||
| May 29, 2012 at 14:21 | history | asked | John | CC BY-SA 3.0 |