Timeline for Euclidean distance is usually not good for sparse data (and more general case)?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
3 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 20, 2015 at 5:19 | comment | added | Jubbles | Thanks for the suggestion of the Mahalanobis distance in lieu of the Euclidean distance when data are correlated. Can you elaborate on why Euclidean distance doesn't handle correlated data as well as Mahalanobis distance? | |
| Jun 1, 2012 at 17:05 | history | edited | Michael R. Chernick | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 1 characters in body
|
| Jun 1, 2012 at 14:59 | history | answered | Michael R. Chernick | CC BY-SA 3.0 |