Timeline for Magnifying the outliers in a rating system to rank objects better
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 31, 2017 at 9:47 | answer | added | hanna | timeline score: 0 | |
| Oct 23, 2017 at 16:38 | history | edited | Nick Cox | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited body
|
| Oct 23, 2017 at 16:37 | comment | added | Nick Cox | The good news for you is that there are many ways to do this; correspondingly the results will be arbitrary. For example, squaring scores will push 3 to 9, 4 to 16, 5 to 25. Or you take the mean of the 5 or 10 highest scores, or whatever. Will anyone insist on means if you can make a case that another summary suits your purposes better? The question is who judges your work here and what will they expect. (I have no idea what you mean by "significant" here.) | |
| Oct 23, 2017 at 16:10 | review | First posts | |||
| Oct 23, 2017 at 16:31 | |||||
| Oct 23, 2017 at 16:06 | history | asked | Mad Mopper | CC BY-SA 3.0 |