Timeline for Quantile regression with transformation of response
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
13 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jan 18, 2018 at 18:20 | comment | added | shadi | @whuber, I just edited the question and provided more information. | |
Jan 18, 2018 at 18:18 | history | edited | shadi | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 709 characters in body
|
Jan 18, 2018 at 17:33 | comment | added | whuber♦ | I don't know whether your regression is "correct": see Nick Cox's answer. I am only pointing out that your question is unclear because it asks how to apply quantile regression, you applied it, and you got a result that is consistent with the data. There's no information to determine whether that is meaningful, appropriate, or correct for your purposes. | |
Jan 18, 2018 at 17:18 | comment | added | shadi | @NickCox, thanks for the reply, I changed the title as you requested. I used power normal transformation and the calculated lambda is -0.37. Based on your advice I used the cube root (please see the final plot above). The nature of observation between 0 to 1 year is different from the rest of the observations. So any advice? I want to make the growth chart at 0.025 and 0.95 quantiles. The data set includes the information of kids from birth to 19 years old. Do you think that I should apply two different quantile regression for 0-1 year old and 1 year to 19 years old? | |
Jan 18, 2018 at 17:16 | comment | added | shadi | @whuber, thanks for the reply. It means you think I use the transformation method in a correct way and also the method for applying the quantile curves is chosen correctly? | |
Jan 18, 2018 at 16:32 | history | edited | shadi | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 2 characters in body; edited title
|
Jan 18, 2018 at 16:27 | history | edited | shadi | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 2 characters in body; edited title
|
Jan 18, 2018 at 16:18 | comment | added | Nick Cox | You need a better title. It's not informative. Something like "Quantile regression with transformation of response" would work better. | |
Jan 18, 2018 at 15:51 | answer | added | Nick Cox | timeline score: 1 | |
Jan 18, 2018 at 15:45 | comment | added | whuber♦ | What is the problem, exactly? Your quantile regression appears to have succeeded. | |
Jan 18, 2018 at 15:23 | history | edited | shadi | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 11 characters in body
|
Jan 18, 2018 at 15:04 | review | First posts | |||
Jan 18, 2018 at 15:12 | |||||
Jan 18, 2018 at 15:00 | history | asked | shadi | CC BY-SA 3.0 |