Timeline for Does correlation = 0.2 mean that there is an association "in only 1 in 5 people"?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 18, 2018 at 1:50 | comment | added | Nat | Does it count as trolling to +1 something just to further the strangeness that is SE? | |
| Feb 17, 2018 at 23:30 | comment | added | amoeba | Haha, you are the master! | |
| Feb 17, 2018 at 23:27 | comment | added | Kodiologist | @amoeba If you think that's wild, check out my highest-scoring answer. | |
| Feb 17, 2018 at 22:27 | comment | added | amoeba | Weird things happen with threads that get into the Hot Network list. This answer is obviously correct and fine... but 57 upvotes?! :-) | |
| Feb 15, 2018 at 13:54 | comment | added | Nuclear Hoagie | What's more, even in a population where 20% of people showed perfect correlation between height and intelligence and 80% showed zero correlation, the population-wide correlation isn't necessarily 0.2. The statement is wrong in several ways! | |
| Feb 15, 2018 at 13:41 | vote | accept | Sitak | ||
| Feb 14, 2018 at 20:29 | history | answered | Kodiologist | CC BY-SA 3.0 |