Timeline for What does a large Relative Risk Ratio mean?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 28, 2018 at 20:28 | comment | added | JWH2006 | That is a distinct possibility. In my opinion, though, if there is a large large RR that is associated with a category, and it does not make sense in the literature. Its more likely that it is an error (i.e. in the case of the op and scaling), than that a new finding has been stumbled upon. | |
| Feb 27, 2018 at 12:59 | vote | accept | guaguncher | ||
| Feb 27, 2018 at 12:59 | |||||
| Feb 26, 2018 at 23:26 | comment | added | AdamO | But what of the prevalence of the outcome? It's possible these results are just due to a large imbalance in two or more levels of the categorical outcome. | |
| Feb 26, 2018 at 17:45 | history | answered | JWH2006 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |