Timeline for Should I give more weight to goodness of fit or to conceptual approach?. Example
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 11, 2018 at 11:50 | history | edited | Florian Hartig | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added a bit of explanation
|
| Jun 16, 2018 at 7:39 | vote | accept | Charly | ||
| May 26, 2018 at 13:50 | history | edited | Florian Hartig | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
improved readability
|
| May 24, 2018 at 14:23 | comment | added | gung - Reinstate Monica | @Charly, you should consider the community's assessment of the quality of these two answers (as expressed by the vote totals). I would urge you to be cautious about acting on Subhash's advice. You may also want to switch which answer is accepted. | |
| May 18, 2018 at 19:15 | comment | added | Charly | Thank you Florian Hartig for your answer. I have k/n proportions, but I checked for overdispersion, as you suggested and it is very high. I will have to add an observation level random effect to deal with it. | |
| May 18, 2018 at 14:43 | history | answered | Florian Hartig | CC BY-SA 4.0 |