Skip to main content
Notice removed Draw attention by z8080
Bounty Ended with vkehayas's answer chosen by z8080
added 191 characters in body
Source Link
z8080
  • 2.4k
  • 3
  • 27
  • 46

I have data from a study in which subjects were listening to a musical piece and asked to press a key at certain moments. Each 5-second periodThe time axis has been segmented into adjacent epochs of time (epochof varying durations) in the piece hasthat have, for music analysis purposes, been labelled as type A, B or C, with adjacent 5-second. Adjacent epochs are not necessarily of the same type, and there are more type-B and type-C epochs than there are of type-A.

For each subject, I then computed a keypress count within each 5-second epoch in the piece, and thus obtained cross-subject means for each epoch, several valuesones for each epoch type (A,B,C).

I would like to do a statistical test between these group means to check for a significant difference between A-B-C, but the problem I see is that there isbeing an unequal number of elements (epochs) in each of the 3 groups. I think a repeated-measures ANOVA is therefore probably unsuitable.

I also think based on this past CV post that the unequal-number-of-elements-in-each-group problem can be overcome by computing pair-wise differences when such pairs can be defined, and then running paired-samples t-test on the difference (A vs B, B vs C, A vs C). However, I am not sure this data is truly "paired" since the data points are 5-secondrefer to epochs from various parts of the piece; or even really "repeated measures" in the traditional sense!

Does it even make sense to run a statistical test in this case, and if so, which test is appropriate?

I have data from a study in which subjects were listening to a musical piece and asked to press a key at certain moments. Each 5-second period (epoch) in the piece has been labelled as type A, B or C, with adjacent 5-second epochs not necessarily of the same type.

I then computed a keypress count within each 5-second epoch in the piece, and thus obtained several values for each epoch type (A,B,C).

I would like to do a statistical test between these group means to check for a significant difference, but the problem is that there is an unequal number of elements (epochs) in each of the 3 groups. I think a repeated-measures ANOVA is therefore probably unsuitable.

I also think based on this past CV post that the unequal-number-of-elements-in-each-group problem can be overcome by computing pair-wise differences when such pairs can be defined, and then running paired-samples t-test on the difference (A vs B, B vs C, A vs C). However, I am not sure this data is truly "paired" since the data points are 5-second epochs from various parts of the piece; or even really "repeated measures" in the traditional sense!

Does it even make sense to run a statistical test in this case, and if so, which test is appropriate?

I have data from a study in which subjects were listening to a musical piece and asked to press a key at certain moments. The time axis has been segmented into adjacent epochs of time (of varying durations) that have, for music analysis purposes, been labelled as type A, B or C. Adjacent epochs are not necessarily of the same type, and there are more type-B and type-C epochs than there are of type-A.

For each subject, I computed a keypress count within each epoch in the piece, and thus obtained cross-subject means for each epoch, several ones for each epoch type (A,B,C).

I would like to do a statistical test between these group means to check for a significant difference between A-B-C, but the problem I see is there being an unequal number of elements (epochs) in each of the 3 groups. I think a repeated-measures ANOVA is therefore probably unsuitable.

I also think based on this past CV post that the unequal-number-of-elements-in-each-group problem can be overcome by computing pair-wise differences when such pairs can be defined, and then running paired-samples t-test on the difference (A vs B, B vs C, A vs C). However, I am not sure this data is truly "paired" since the data points refer to epochs from various parts of the piece; or even really "repeated measures" in the traditional sense!

Does it even make sense to run a statistical test in this case, and if so, which test is appropriate?

deleted 99 characters in body
Source Link
z8080
  • 2.4k
  • 3
  • 27
  • 46

(any comments on how I can edit the question and improve its clarity, if lacking, are welcome!)

I have data from a study in which subjects were listening to a musical piece and asked to press a key at certain moments. Each 5-second period (epoch) in the piece has been labelled as type A, B or C, with adjacent 5-second epochs not necessarily of the same type.

I then computed a keypress count within each 5-second epoch in the piece, and thus obtained several values for each epoch type (A,B,C).

I would like to do a statistical test between these group means to check for a significant difference, but the problem is that there is an unequal number of elements (epochs) in each of the 3 groups. I think a repeated-measures ANOVA is therefore probably unsuitable.

I also think based on this past CV post that the unequal-number-of-elements-in-each-group problem can be overcome by computing pair-wise differences when such pairs can be defined, and then running paired-samples t-test on the difference (A vs B, B vs C, A vs C). However, I am not sure this data is truly "paired" since the data points are 5-second epochs from various parts of the piece; or even really "repeated measures" in the traditional sense!

Does it even make sense to run a statistical test in this case, and if so, which test is appropriate?

(any comments on how I can edit the question and improve its clarity, if lacking, are welcome!)

I have data from a study in which subjects were listening to a musical piece and asked to press a key at certain moments. Each 5-second period (epoch) in the piece has been labelled as type A, B or C, with adjacent 5-second epochs not necessarily of the same type.

I then computed a keypress count within each 5-second epoch in the piece, and thus obtained several values for each epoch type (A,B,C).

I would like to do a statistical test between these group means to check for a significant difference, but the problem is that there is an unequal number of elements (epochs) in each of the 3 groups. I think a repeated-measures ANOVA is therefore probably unsuitable.

I also think based on this past CV post that the unequal-number-of-elements-in-each-group problem can be overcome by computing pair-wise differences when such pairs can be defined, and then running paired-samples t-test on the difference (A vs B, B vs C, A vs C). However, I am not sure this data is truly "paired" since the data points are 5-second epochs from various parts of the piece; or even really "repeated measures" in the traditional sense!

Does it even make sense to run a statistical test in this case, and if so, which test is appropriate?

I have data from a study in which subjects were listening to a musical piece and asked to press a key at certain moments. Each 5-second period (epoch) in the piece has been labelled as type A, B or C, with adjacent 5-second epochs not necessarily of the same type.

I then computed a keypress count within each 5-second epoch in the piece, and thus obtained several values for each epoch type (A,B,C).

I would like to do a statistical test between these group means to check for a significant difference, but the problem is that there is an unequal number of elements (epochs) in each of the 3 groups. I think a repeated-measures ANOVA is therefore probably unsuitable.

I also think based on this past CV post that the unequal-number-of-elements-in-each-group problem can be overcome by computing pair-wise differences when such pairs can be defined, and then running paired-samples t-test on the difference (A vs B, B vs C, A vs C). However, I am not sure this data is truly "paired" since the data points are 5-second epochs from various parts of the piece; or even really "repeated measures" in the traditional sense!

Does it even make sense to run a statistical test in this case, and if so, which test is appropriate?

Notice added Draw attention by z8080
Bounty Started worth 50 reputation by z8080
added 99 characters in body
Source Link
z8080
  • 2.4k
  • 3
  • 27
  • 46

(any comments on how I can edit the question and improve its clarity, if lacking, are welcome!)

I have data from a study in which subjects were listening to a musical piece and asked to press a key at certain moments. Each 5-second period (epoch) in the piece has been labelled as type A, B or C, with adjacent 5-second epochs not necessarily of the same type.

I then computed a keypress count within each 5-second epoch in the piece, and thus obtained several values for each epoch type (A,B,C).

I would like to do a statistical test between these group means to check for a significant difference, but the problem is that there is an unequal number of elements (epochs) in each of the 3 groups. I think a repeated-measures ANOVA is therefore probably unsuitable.

I also think based on this past CV post that the unequal-number-of-elements-in-each-group problem can be overcome by computing pair-wise differences when such pairs can be defined, and then running paired-samples t-test on the difference (A vs B, B vs C, A vs C). However, I am not sure this data is truly "paired" since the data points are 5-second epochs from various parts of the piece; or even really "repeated measures" in the traditional sense!

Does it even make sense to run a statistical test in this case, and if so, which test is appropriate?

I have data from a study in which subjects were listening to a musical piece and asked to press a key at certain moments. Each 5-second period (epoch) in the piece has been labelled as type A, B or C, with adjacent 5-second epochs not necessarily of the same type.

I then computed a keypress count within each 5-second epoch in the piece, and thus obtained several values for each epoch type (A,B,C).

I would like to do a statistical test between these group means to check for a significant difference, but the problem is that there is an unequal number of elements (epochs) in each of the 3 groups. I think a repeated-measures ANOVA is therefore probably unsuitable.

I also think based on this past CV post that the unequal-number-of-elements-in-each-group problem can be overcome by computing pair-wise differences when such pairs can be defined, and then running paired-samples t-test on the difference (A vs B, B vs C, A vs C). However, I am not sure this data is truly "paired" since the data points are 5-second epochs from various parts of the piece; or even really "repeated measures" in the traditional sense!

Does it even make sense to run a statistical test in this case, and if so, which test is appropriate?

(any comments on how I can edit the question and improve its clarity, if lacking, are welcome!)

I have data from a study in which subjects were listening to a musical piece and asked to press a key at certain moments. Each 5-second period (epoch) in the piece has been labelled as type A, B or C, with adjacent 5-second epochs not necessarily of the same type.

I then computed a keypress count within each 5-second epoch in the piece, and thus obtained several values for each epoch type (A,B,C).

I would like to do a statistical test between these group means to check for a significant difference, but the problem is that there is an unequal number of elements (epochs) in each of the 3 groups. I think a repeated-measures ANOVA is therefore probably unsuitable.

I also think based on this past CV post that the unequal-number-of-elements-in-each-group problem can be overcome by computing pair-wise differences when such pairs can be defined, and then running paired-samples t-test on the difference (A vs B, B vs C, A vs C). However, I am not sure this data is truly "paired" since the data points are 5-second epochs from various parts of the piece; or even really "repeated measures" in the traditional sense!

Does it even make sense to run a statistical test in this case, and if so, which test is appropriate?

edited title
Link
z8080
  • 2.4k
  • 3
  • 27
  • 46
Loading
added 320 characters in body; edited tags
Source Link
z8080
  • 2.4k
  • 3
  • 27
  • 46
Loading
Source Link
z8080
  • 2.4k
  • 3
  • 27
  • 46
Loading