Timeline for An example where the likelihood principle *really* matters?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
14 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 11, 2020 at 14:32 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
| Dec 5, 2018 at 23:19 | history | edited | Sextus Empiricus | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 1120 characters in body
|
| Dec 5, 2018 at 22:35 | history | edited | Sextus Empiricus | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 315 characters in body
|
| Dec 5, 2018 at 19:25 | comment | added | user227843 | You need to pick two statistics that will have proportional likelihoods, such as the number of trials until 3 success or the number of successes in n trials etc. | |
| Dec 5, 2018 at 19:15 | comment | added | user227843 | @MartijnWeterings yes it is choosing a different test statistics, what matters is the likelihood of the statistics, not of the data. Otherwise I can take a sequence of 100 flips and compute several statsistics: number of runs of heads, number of alternations of heads and tails. None of this violates the LP. | |
| Dec 4, 2018 at 21:36 | history | edited | Sextus Empiricus | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 31 characters in body
|
| Dec 4, 2018 at 20:35 | comment | added | amoeba | Regarding Case 1: I think choosing a different test statistic can (should?) be seen as changing the likelihood function. | |
| Dec 3, 2018 at 13:12 | history | edited | Sextus Empiricus | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 31 characters in body
|
| Dec 3, 2018 at 13:06 | history | edited | Sextus Empiricus | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 31 characters in body
|
| Dec 3, 2018 at 13:00 | history | edited | Sextus Empiricus | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 1957 characters in body
|
| Dec 3, 2018 at 12:54 | history | edited | Sextus Empiricus | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 1957 characters in body
|
| Dec 2, 2018 at 23:25 | history | edited | Sextus Empiricus | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 120 characters in body
|
| Dec 2, 2018 at 23:18 | history | edited | Sextus Empiricus | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 18 characters in body
|
| Dec 2, 2018 at 23:04 | history | answered | Sextus Empiricus | CC BY-SA 4.0 |