Timeline for Analysing partially ordered responses
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 17, 2019 at 8:22 | history | edited | Poul | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Added way of ordering as nominal variable.
|
| Jan 16, 2019 at 10:20 | history | edited | Poul | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Added suggested way of ordering the variables as ordinal.
|
| Jan 16, 2019 at 10:13 | history | edited | Poul | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Added suggested way of ordering the variables as ordinal.
|
| Jan 15, 2019 at 21:31 | comment | added | Poul | I'm wondering if the dependent variable forms a partially ordered set, or poset? | |
| Jan 15, 2019 at 21:24 | comment | added | Poul | I'm interested in order effects. Ie, if a judge makes a certain decision, is he more likely to make a similar decision in the next case? | |
| Jan 15, 2019 at 21:19 | comment | added | Poul | Thanks @Wiil C! I guess there are two related issues: 1. There are some ordered dependent variables, ie prison < other orders < unconditional bail, but of the other orders, there is no clear order, and they can arise in combination. Which leads to issue 2. A judge could order combinations of other orders such as post deposit PLUS report to the police PLUS a curfew. | |
| Jan 15, 2019 at 19:16 | answer | added | Will C | timeline score: 0 | |
| Jan 15, 2019 at 16:00 | review | First posts | |||
| Jan 15, 2019 at 16:24 | |||||
| Jan 15, 2019 at 15:56 | history | asked | Poul | CC BY-SA 4.0 |