Skip to main content
Tweeted twitter.com/StackStats/status/1090489923973668864
added 25 characters in body
Source Link

If we have sample mean of $n$ observations as $\bar{x}$. It is given that maximum value of the whole set is $M$ and minimum value is $0$. How many more observations we need so that the estimate for average we have differs from the true average by not more than 10 with 99% confidence?

If we have sample mean of $n$ observations as $\bar{x}$. It is given that maximum value of the whole set is $M$. How many more observations we need so that the estimate for average we have differs from the true average by not more than 10 with 99% confidence?

If we have sample mean of $n$ observations as $\bar{x}$. It is given that maximum value of the whole set is $M$ and minimum value is $0$. How many more observations we need so that the estimate for average we have differs from the true average by not more than 10 with 99% confidence?

edited title
Link
AdamO
  • 64.8k
  • 6
  • 135
  • 273

Estimating population sample size en poussant

added 6 characters in body
Source Link
AdamO
  • 64.8k
  • 6
  • 135
  • 273

If we have sample mean of p$n$ observations as R$\bar{x}$. It is given that maximum value of the whole set is M$M$. How many more observations we need so that the estimate for average we have differs from the true average by not more than 10 with 99% confidence?

If we have sample mean of p observations as R. It is given that maximum value of the whole set is M. How many more observations we need so that the estimate for average we have differs from the true average by not more than 10 with 99% confidence?

If we have sample mean of $n$ observations as $\bar{x}$. It is given that maximum value of the whole set is $M$. How many more observations we need so that the estimate for average we have differs from the true average by not more than 10 with 99% confidence?

Source Link
Loading