Timeline for Confused about conditional counterparts to traditional probability laws
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
5 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dec 30, 2019 at 17:04 | vote | accept | Noah Stebbins | ||
May 23, 2019 at 21:40 | history | edited | kjetil b halvorsen♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 52 characters in body
|
May 12, 2019 at 15:42 | history | edited | kjetil b halvorsen♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 915 characters in body
|
May 7, 2019 at 22:45 | comment | added | Noah Stebbins | Thank you for the response! The formula above for $Q(\cdot) = P(\cdot|\theta)$ makes sense for $Q(x,y)$ and $Q(y)$ as those terms would translate to $P(x,y|\theta)$ and $P(y|\theta)$ respectively, but what about for $Q(x|y)$? Wouldn't that term translate to $P(x|y|\theta)$? Why does $P(x|y|\theta) = P(x|y, \theta)$? | |
May 7, 2019 at 21:13 | history | answered | kjetil b halvorsen♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |