Timeline for Interpretation of standardized (z-score rescaled) linear model coefficients
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
14 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 1, 2021 at 11:45 | history | edited | mkt | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 3 characters in body
|
| Mar 4, 2021 at 6:18 | history | edited | mkt | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 36 characters in body
|
| May 17, 2019 at 9:21 | history | edited | mkt | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 72 characters in body
|
| May 13, 2019 at 13:54 | history | edited | mkt | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 45 characters in body
|
| May 13, 2019 at 11:58 | vote | accept | Stevestingray | ||
| May 13, 2019 at 11:54 | comment | added | mkt | @TomvanHeusden How much that is really depends on the values in your dataset, since the standard deviation is calculated from the data; this is unlike unstandardized coefficients which are more easy to apply outside the context of your data. But you can also transform the values back onto the original scale. | |
| May 13, 2019 at 11:53 | comment | added | mkt | @TomvanHeusden No problem, I should have been clearer: instead of change, I should have said increase. I've edited the answer to correct that. | |
| May 13, 2019 at 11:51 | history | edited | mkt | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 2 characters in body
|
| May 13, 2019 at 11:32 | comment | added | Stevestingray | Thanks a lot for your explanation! One last question if thats OK: I can't really wrap my head around the interpretation. I know what it means now, but i can't imagine what the effect is in terms of standard deviations. If i understand correctly: A one standard deviation change is not an in- or decrease in the value of the predictor? How does a 'one standard deviation' relate to the original values? What does it mean ín the field?'. Sorry if it's is a simple question, but i cant figure it out. | |
| May 13, 2019 at 10:37 | history | edited | mkt | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 169 characters in body
|
| May 13, 2019 at 10:34 | comment | added | mkt | @TomvanHeusden No need to do that! I've edited my answer to explain things based on your comment here. | |
| May 13, 2019 at 10:28 | comment | added | Stevestingray | Thanks so much for the explanation! I defined my model better in the top. Unfortunately, I did not normalize the dependant variable (vegetation change). I will run a new model with the normalized vegetation scores. | |
| May 13, 2019 at 9:39 | history | edited | mkt | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 15 characters in body
|
| May 13, 2019 at 9:32 | history | answered | mkt | CC BY-SA 4.0 |