Timeline for Clustering without test set and evaluation
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 4, 2019 at 15:28 | answer | added | Christos Karatsalos | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jun 4, 2019 at 11:38 | comment | added | R_clustering | Thank you for your answer. I tried some algorithmes but the patterns are too different and i can't say what is the best clustering just by looking at the plots. and the KL isn't decreasing. | |
| Jun 4, 2019 at 10:51 | history | edited | Ferdi | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 13 characters in body
|
| Jun 4, 2019 at 9:09 | comment | added | David | Well, since you don't know a priori what the clusters would be, having a test set is not only unnecesary, but completely useless! There would be no "labels" on the test set! Just go ahead with your clustering and find something that does the job | |
| Jun 4, 2019 at 7:55 | review | First posts | |||
| Jun 4, 2019 at 12:33 | |||||
| Jun 4, 2019 at 7:54 | history | asked | R_clustering | CC BY-SA 4.0 |