Timeline for Negative AIC values [duplicate]
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 1, 2019 at 14:25 | comment | added | simone | I am not sure this question is a duplicate of that question. Olivia is asking which model has more support, not if it is possible to get negative AIC values. As @Heteroskedastic Jim says, the model with the lowest value (AIC = -161.5795) should be better. However, it is always better to check the package documentation because this is not always true depending on the formulation used to compute AIC (BIC, etc.). Have a look here: stats.stackexchange.com/questions/195096/… | |
| Jul 1, 2019 at 13:36 | history | closed | Tim | Duplicate of On Negative AIC Values | |
| Jul 1, 2019 at 13:34 | comment | added | Heteroskedastic Jim | Smaller remains better, so -161.5795 is to be selected based on minimum AIC criterion. And that AIC difference is huge. | |
| Jul 1, 2019 at 13:31 | history | asked | Olivia | CC BY-SA 4.0 |